Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

  1. #11
    Inactive Member Ironlung's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 17th, 2002
    Posts
    10,218
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    Quote Originally Posted by joe morgan View Post
    You're probably right, but Lee High coming in is what allowed Clintwood to drop. No offense to Clintwood, but none of the little guys in the region can compete against a football school like Clintwood, and wasn't that the intent of the rule?
    So since none of the " little guys in the region can compete against a football school like Clintwood" shouldn't Burton go up too? They're the only D1 schools to beat each other in what 4-6 years? And no, it wasn't part of the "rule".
    "There he goes, one of Gods own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die"

  2. #12
    Inactive Member UTVols2's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17th, 2006
    Posts
    5,601
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    I'm glad Clintwood came down, made the playoffs interesting and fun again. Even though none of us have brought home the gold in the past few years it has been good football to watch.
    [IMG]http://www.gifsoup.com/view/926256/tennessee-vols-al-wilson-o.gif[/IMG]

  3. #13
    Inactive Member Ironlung's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 17th, 2002
    Posts
    10,218
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    Clintwood has lost the last 2 by a td. JIB could have had one against Riverheads. I'm not sure how there will NEVER be another D1 team in this area with a chance to win another one. It's not like the D2 schools are burning it up right now either. So I don't know how moving our best D1 shots(s) to D2 is supposed to help. The area as a whole just needs to get better even if they're playing schools with 2x's the enrollment in the last game. It looks to me like Clintwood and JIB have a lot of good talent in the freshmen ranks right now. I think Clintwood has a chance at having the best RB they've had since G. Phillips who's a freshmen. They have what might be the best WR they've ever had playing QB right now and next year they have a QB who'll more than likely be starting who has a chance to be the best QB they've had since the early 90's.
    "There he goes, one of Gods own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die"

  4. #14
    Inactive Member royalflush's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 29th, 2007
    Posts
    229
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    Doesn't Clintwood have nearly twice the enrollment as St. Paul? But there's nowhere for St. Paul to drop. That's why they need a 6A system.

  5. #15
    Inactive Member starbuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 20th, 2004
    Posts
    5,852
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    does Clintwood really have that many more kids than Norton? I didn't think so but I could be wrong. I have no problem with Clintwood being D1. Makes the Raiders play harder and better.
    [IMG]http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51%2BfhmkstgL._SS500_.jpg[/IMG] [URL="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51%2BfhmkstgL._SS500_.jpg"] [/URL]

  6. #16
    Inactive Member beamer_ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 23rd, 2005
    Posts
    2,840
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    Quote Originally Posted by royalflush View Post
    Doesn't Clintwood have nearly twice the enrollment as St. Paul? But there's nowhere for St. Paul to drop. That's why they need a 6A system.
    People bring that up and yet Clintwood and St. Paul would still be in the class, haha. Think I'd be looking more at situations with teams like Buffalo Gap having way more than that...

  7. #17
    Inactive Member beamer_ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 23rd, 2005
    Posts
    2,840
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    Quote Originally Posted by starbuck View Post
    does Clintwood really have that many more kids than Norton? I didn't think so but I could be wrong. I have no problem with Clintwood being D1. Makes the Raiders play harder and better.
    Clintwood 318
    J.I. Burton 252
    http://www.vhsl.org/files/fb-divisions-2009-10.pdf

  8. #18
    Inactive Member royalflush's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 29th, 2007
    Posts
    229
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    True. But if there was a system like that, they could put in a rule that wouldn't let any teams drop.

  9. #19
    HB Forum Owner R0cketer's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 16th, 2002
    Posts
    7,632
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    Don't think there is a perfect solution, and with state enrollment figures its going to be tough. Think of it this way.

    If you go with St. Paul's numbers, there are only 6 schools (them included) within 100 students of each other.

    If you from Clintwood down, there is 10 schoos (them included) within 100, actually 2 more if you count the bigger division.

    If you go in the bigger division, and discount Lee since nobody likes to count them, Powell Valley only has 3 schools within 100 of them (them included). Gate City is even more than 100 larger than them.

    Disparity of enrollment is tough to fix, you could probably fix it local, only problem is numbers get more skewed across the state.
    What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach, so you get what we had here last week which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it.

  10. #20
    Inactive Member sup-rbeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 27th, 2006
    Posts
    8,846
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Rye Cove rule should be repealed

    Quote Originally Posted by R0cketer View Post
    Don't think there is a perfect solution, and with state enrollment figures its going to be tough. Think of it this way.

    If you go with St. Paul's numbers, there are only 6 schools (them included) within 100 students of each other.

    If you from Clintwood down, there is 10 schoos (them included) within 100, actually 2 more if you count the bigger division.

    If you go in the bigger division, and discount Lee since nobody likes to count them, Powell Valley only has 3 schools within 100 of them (them included). Gate City is even more than 100 larger than them.

    Disparity of enrollment is tough to fix, you could probably fix it local, only problem is numbers get more skewed across the state.
    The problems really came about after someone got the notion that all the classifications should have an equal number of teams....then that is compounded by the divisions being divided at the regional level. A definite cut off line for each division statewide fixes both problems. If it means a region ends up with a 3-7 team in the playoffs, so be it...they won't be there long anyways. But, that's the only way to fix the disparity...call it divisions (D1, D2, etc), classifications (A, AA, AAA etc.), whatever you want to call it....but give it a definite cut off point.
    ...And if you ain't down with that, I got 2 words for ya....

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •